Re: [libvirt] libvirt boolean type
On 01/14/2013 01:02 AM, Claudio Bley wrote:
Nonetheless, I think it still would be valuable as point 2 and 3 still
hold. Just change the definition to:
typedef int virBool;
I'm not too fond of using the term 'bool' for anything tri-state - to
me, bool implies exactly two states. _Maybe_ you could get away with a
typedef for a different name (virTristate?), but at some point, 'int' is
so much easier to type than whatever new typedef, that I don't think we
would be buying much with this proposal.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachments:
- signature.asc (application/pgp-signature — 621 bytes)