On 04/17/2018 06:45 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 06:01:04PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> So far we are repeating the following lines over and over:
>
> if (!(virSomeObjectClass = virClassNew(virClassForObject(),
> "virSomeObject",
> sizeof(virSomeObject),
> virSomeObjectDispose)))
> return -1;
>
> While this works, it is impossible to do some checking. Firstly,
> the class name (the 2nd argument) doesn't match the name in the
> code in all cases (the 3rd argument). Secondly, the current style
> is needlessly verbose. This commit turns example into following:
>
> if (!(VIR_CLASS_NEW(virSomeObject,
> virClassForObject)))
> return -1;
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> src/access/viraccessmanager.c | 5 +-
> src/bhyve/bhyve_conf.c | 5 +-
> src/conf/capabilities.c | 5 +-
> src/conf/domain_capabilities.c | 11 +--
> src/conf/domain_conf.c | 20 +---
> src/conf/domain_event.c | 166 ++++++++------------------------
> src/conf/network_event.c | 14 +--
> src/conf/node_device_event.c | 21 ++--
> src/conf/object_event.c | 12 +--
> src/conf/secret_event.c | 21 ++--
> src/conf/storage_event.c | 21 ++--
> src/conf/virdomainobjlist.c | 5 +-
> src/conf/virinterfaceobj.c | 10 +-
> src/conf/virnetworkobj.c | 11 +--
> src/conf/virnodedeviceobj.c | 10 +-
> src/conf/virsecretobj.c | 10 +-
> src/conf/virstorageobj.c | 20 +---
> src/datatypes.c | 5 +-
> src/interface/interface_backend_netcf.c | 6 +-
> src/libvirt-admin.c | 5 +-
> src/libxl/libxl_conf.c | 5 +-
> src/libxl/libxl_domain.c | 5 +-
> src/libxl/libxl_migration.c | 5 +-
> src/logging/log_handler.c | 5 +-
> src/lxc/lxc_conf.c | 5 +-
> src/lxc/lxc_monitor.c | 5 +-
> src/node_device/node_device_udev.c | 5 +-
> src/qemu/qemu_agent.c | 5 +-
> src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 5 +-
> src/qemu/qemu_conf.c | 11 +--
> src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 51 +++-------
> src/qemu/qemu_monitor.c | 5 +-
> src/rpc/virkeepalive.c | 5 +-
> src/rpc/virnetclient.c | 5 +-
> src/rpc/virnetclientprogram.c | 5 +-
> src/rpc/virnetclientstream.c | 5 +-
> src/rpc/virnetdaemon.c | 5 +-
> src/rpc/virnetlibsshsession.c | 5 +-
> src/rpc/virnetsaslcontext.c | 10 +-
> src/rpc/virnetserver.c | 5 +-
> src/rpc/virnetserverclient.c | 5 +-
> src/rpc/virnetserverprogram.c | 5 +-
> src/rpc/virnetserverservice.c | 5 +-
> src/rpc/virnetsocket.c | 5 +-
> src/rpc/virnetsshsession.c | 5 +-
> src/rpc/virnettlscontext.c | 10 +-
> src/security/security_manager.c | 5 +-
> src/util/virclosecallbacks.c | 11 +--
> src/util/virdnsmasq.c | 6 +-
> src/util/virfdstream.c | 5 +-
> src/util/virfilecache.c | 5 +-
> src/util/virhash.c | 11 +--
> src/util/virhostdev.c | 5 +-
> src/util/viridentity.c | 5 +-
> src/util/virmacmap.c | 5 +-
> src/util/virmdev.c | 5 +-
> src/util/virobject.c | 10 +-
> src/util/virobject.h | 4 +
> src/util/virpci.c | 5 +-
> src/util/virportallocator.c | 5 +-
> src/util/virresctrl.c | 10 +-
> src/util/virscsi.c | 5 +-
> src/util/virscsivhost.c | 5 +-
> src/util/virusb.c | 5 +-
> src/vbox/vbox_common.c | 5 +-
> src/vz/vz_driver.c | 5 +-
> tests/virfilecachetest.c | 5 +-
> 67 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 535 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange(a)redhat.com>
but i can't claim I looked closely at anything except the virobject.h
change - i'm assuming the compile time validation is doing the right
thing :-)
99% of the changes were made by coccinelle and the rest was made by
hand. Then, I interactively added each hunk separately and inspected it
whilst doing so.
Michal