On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 10:33:52 +0200
Andrea Bolognani <abologna(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, 2017-03-24 at 13:36 -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > Turns out this check is excessively strict: there are ways
> > other than <memtune><hard_limit> to raise the memory locking
> > limit for QEMU processes, one prominent example being
> > tweaking /etc/security/limits.conf.
>
> Actually, it seems that limits.conf doesn't work with libvirt
> as mentioned by Daniel in another thread. I didn't know this
> myself btw.
>
> This makes this series even more important because only through
> libvirt we can set this limit to infinity.
Well, it *does* work if you set it up properly, eg. raise the
memory locking limit for the user under which libvirtd will
run instead of the user under which QEMU processes will run.
Doesn't libvirtd run as root?
Doing so is very counter-intuitive, though.
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization