[libvirt] [PATCH v1 02/10] locking: Implement seclabel stubs for NOP

The NOP drivers needs implementation, although the function bodies are empty. This is because the virLockManager APIs check for driver implementation and returns an error if there's none. Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com&gt; --- src/locking/lock_driver_nop.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/locking/lock_driver_nop.c b/src/locking/lock_driver_nop.c index 93a988e..edb450b 100644 --- a/src/locking/lock_driver_nop.c +++ b/src/locking/lock_driver_nop.c @@ -101,6 +101,25 @@ static void virLockManagerNopFree(virLockManagerPtr lock ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED) { } +static int +virLockManagerNopRememberSeclabel(virLockManagerPtr lock ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, + const char *path ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, + const char *model ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, + const char *seclabel ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED) +{ + return 0; +} + +static int +virLockManagerNopRecallSeclabel(virLockManagerPtr lock ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, + const char *path ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, + const char *model ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, + char **seclabel ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED) +{ + /* A positive return value means no seclabel restoring. */ + return 1; +} + virLockDriver virLockDriverNop = { .version = VIR_LOCK_MANAGER_VERSION, @@ -118,4 +137,7 @@ virLockDriver virLockDriverNop = .drvRelease = virLockManagerNopRelease, .drvInquire = virLockManagerNopInquire, + + .drvRemember = virLockManagerNopRememberSeclabel, + .drvRecall = virLockManagerNopRecallSeclabel, }; -- 1.8.5.5