On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 05:44:19PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 11:46:22AM +0300, Roman Bolshakov wrote:
> An outstanding issue is whether management applications can rely on the
> value of /machine/accel/type and output of qom-list-types command [2][3]
> to get current and present accels?
>
> i.e. would it be ok if libvirt assumes that everything up to the first
> dash in the accel type is the name of the accel (as specified via -M
> accel=ACCEL flag) when it performs QEMU probing?
Hmm, I think it is not nice - we shouldn't have to parse the
accel type names - IMHO typenames should be considered arbitrary
opaque strings, even if they'll not be expected to change.
Thanks Daniel. I'll then send v2 of ad-hoc QMP/HMP query. By the way, do
we need the HMP query if we get accel in QOM?
Regards,
Roman