On 02/15/2013 12:02 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
Although in IPv4 one must pick either mac or name, either
can be omitted. Similarly, for IPv6, the name
can be optionally omitted.
Signed-off-by: Gene Czarcinski <gene(a)czarc.net>
---
docs/schemas/network.rng | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/docs/schemas/network.rng b/docs/schemas/network.rng
index 09d7c73..a479453 100644
--- a/docs/schemas/network.rng
+++ b/docs/schemas/network.rng
@@ -281,7 +281,9 @@
<optional>
<attribute name="mac"><ref
name="uniMacAddr"/></attribute>
</optional>
- <attribute
name="name"><text/></attribute>
+ <optional>
+ <attribute
name="name"><text/></attribute>
+ </optional>
Hmm. This says that I can omit both name and mac, and still validate.
Better would be this RelaxNG construct, which says that I must supply at
least one, but can also supply both; the difference is that failure to
supply either will cause a (desired) validation failure.
<choice>
<group>
<attribute name="mac"><ref
name="uniMacAddr"/></attribute>
<optional>
<attribute name="name"><text/></attribute>
</optional>
</group>
<attribute name="name"><text/></attribute>
</choice>
I know Laine already ack'd but since we haven't pushed yet, I'm
wondering if it is worth tightening the grammar.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org