On 01/06/2014 03:18 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>>> +
>>> + if (initctlRequested || !flags)
>>> + useInitctl = true;
>>
>> I'm not sure this logic is right.
>
> Yuck - commit aa4619337 is broken.
>
>>
>
> This is still unfortunately the case in what you pushed. And how come
> you didn't do the same treatment to lxcDomainReboot, which also has two
> different flags where we need proper fallback when initctl is
> unsupported? Your commit conflicts with the pending CVE-2013-6456
> efforts (my patch at [1]), so we need to get this resolved.
>
> [1]
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-December/msg01249.html
>
Yep, I've pushed it accidentally. I've merged a branch which wasn't
rebased onto master but onto a different local brach containing this
commit. I suggest reverting my commit. I'll post better version (with
lxcDomainReboot) then. Sorry for the noise.
No problems; we still have time to get it right before the release. For
now, I've pushed the revert patch.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org