On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 07:51:51AM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 04:48:06PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> Current libvirt checks xenstore for a xen guests
> fixed vnc port on xend > 3.0.3. At least on f8
> though, hvm guests don't store the vnc port in
> xenstore, it is stored in the sexpr.
>
> Patch fixes the logic to look in the sexpr if
> the xenstore lookup appears to fail. This fixes
> setting static vnc ports for f8 xen hvm guests.
Sounds fine to me though I winder if it's not better
to check on the given SExpr first and then do a Xenstore
lookup only if needed. Seems to me a more generally coherent
approach, any expected drawback to this ?
Historically XenD only ever put the VNC port in xenstore. Including it
in the SEXPR is something new in 3.2.0 IIRC.
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o-
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org -o-
http://ovirt.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|