[snip]
>> for (i = 0; i < *nparams; i++) {
>> virNodeCPUStatsPtr param = ¶ms[i];
>
> What about this?
>
> diff --git a/src/nodeinfo.c b/src/nodeinfo.c
> index 1838547..aa1ad81 100644
> --- a/src/nodeinfo.c
> +++ b/src/nodeinfo.c
> @@ -637,8 +637,9 @@ linuxNodeGetCPUStats(FILE *procstat,
>
> while (fgets(line, sizeof(line), procstat) != NULL) {
> char *buf = line;
> + char **buf_header = virStringSplit(buf, " ", 2);
>
> - if (STRPREFIX(buf, cpu_header)) { /* aka logical CPU time */
> + if (STREQ(buf_header[0], cpu_header)) { /* aka logical CPU time */
> size_t i;
>
> if (sscanf(buf,
> @@ -697,6 +698,7 @@ linuxNodeGetCPUStats(FILE *procstat,
> ret = 0;
> goto cleanup;
> }
> + virStringFreeList(buf_header);
> }
>
> virReportInvalidArg(cpuNum,
>
>
This is definitely better and lesser amount of code..
I think the version with virStringSplit would need some fine tuning since in its
current form it will not free the memory for the failure cases..Comments ?
Also can some expert here provide some tips on whether in this particular
circumstance it should be fine to allocate/realloc/free memory inside the while
loop. Would be very helpful..
Thanks,
Pradipta
Thanks
>
>>
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
>>
>> --
>> libvir-list mailing list
>> libvir-list(a)redhat.com
>>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
>>
>>
>>
>