Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/4] Introduce virFileSync
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 19:26:24 +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
It still needs to be enhanced to be fully portable and working even
if
fsync() implementation is insane (e.g., on OSX).
---
Notes:
Although ideally gnulib would provide us with a sane fsync() and
fdatasync() replacements (it already does so for fsync on Win32)
so this could probably be dropped in favor of a possible future
extension of gnulib (we do not provide any better solution anyway).
I will just drop this patch. Gnulib now provides fdatasync replacement and as
it turned out fsync on OSX is not as bad as we thought so we don't need a
replacement there. virFileSync doesn't give us anything beyond that.
Jirka