On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 03:25:55PM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 02:20:17PM +0100, Tim Wiederhake wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> src/lxc/lxc_driver.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc_driver.c b/src/lxc/lxc_driver.c
> index 7bc39120ee..42053de9c3 100644
> --- a/src/lxc/lxc_driver.c
> +++ b/src/lxc/lxc_driver.c
> @@ -4045,9 +4045,9 @@ lxcDomainDetachDeviceHostdevUSBLive(virLXCDriver *driver,
> VIR_WARN("cannot deny device %s for domain %s: %s",
> dst, vm->def->name, virGetLastErrorMessage());
>
> - virObjectLock(hostdev_mgr->activeUSBHostdevs);
> - virUSBDeviceListDel(hostdev_mgr->activeUSBHostdevs, usb);
> - virObjectUnlock(hostdev_mgr->activeUSBHostdevs);
> + VIR_WITH_OBJECT_LOCK_GUARD(hostdev_mgr->activeUSBHostdevs) {
> + virUSBDeviceListDel(hostdev_mgr->activeUSBHostdevs, usb);
> + }
Even nicer you can omit the curly brackets and make this a +2/-3 ;)
Otherwise I guess we'd need some kind of stylistic guide to keep us
consistent in this regard right from the start.
My preference is the keep the scope of the guarded section explicit
using {} even with a 1 line body.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
https://berrange.com -o-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|:
https://libvirt.org -o-
https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|:
https://entangle-photo.org -o-
https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|