On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 03:27:53PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 04/02/2010 03:19 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>>> + managed_save = qemuDomainManagedSavePath(driver, vm);
>>> + if ((managed_save) && (virFileExists(managed_save))) {
>>> + /* We should still have a reference left to vm but */
>>
>> Incomplete comment?
in retrospect, yes, unless you could read my mind :-)
> not really, that could be "but ..." or "but one
should check for 0
> anyway"
>
> I end up with the following additional patch,
> - /* We should still have a reference left to vm but */
> + /*
> + * We should still have a reference left to vm but
> + * but one should check for 0 anyway
> + */
s/but but/but/
Dohh right, fixed, thanks !
It's interesting how one perceive things differently in code and
comments between a cold out of context analysis, and a warm one
where a lot of mental assumptions have already be made around it.
And what makes this external review process so effective (an I guess
core part of the Extreme Programming method).
So thanks a lot of your feedback :-)
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit
http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel(a)veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine
http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library
http://libvirt.org/