Re: [libvirt] Question about PHP licencing for libvirt-php (php-libvirt for Fedora)

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 01:46:31PM +0100, Michal Novotny wrote: > On 03/10/2011 01:26 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 01:03:57PM +0100, Radek Hladik wrote: >>> Hi all, >>>> Well, I agree that LGPLv2+ license would be better. We need to wait for >>>> Lyre's and Radek's reply then. [snip] > I don't know what should we do but I guess having the dual-licensing > could be the best thing. We can't have the project name php-libvirt > because of the PHP license :( So we avoid the PHP license for our code then. Here's what we do - Our code is licensed LGPLv2+ - Project is named/described 'libvirt bindings for PHP' - RPM / tar.gz is named php-libvirt (this is in fact required by Fedora RPM guidelines for php extensions) Regards, Daniel