On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:20:34AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Wed, 2018-04-25 at 15:24 +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> According to previous discussions it looks like this is the preferred way
> of casting. One difference to the previous one is that this time I
> tuned the regexp a bit so that it doesn't match some macros and
> assignments and it also matches structs.
I was quite surprised, while reviewing some code, that an obvious
case of "space after cast" was not being caught by syntax-check; a
bit of digging made me realize that this series was never fully
merged, with the syntax-check part notably still missing.
Do you have any plans to pick this up again?
Some changes needed to be done and I have done the change locally, I remember,
but then I don't seem to recall if I found yet another problem with it or just
ran out of the backside of a particular rodent to hand out. I can have a look
and try to repost if you'd like.
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization