On 10/27/2011 05:26 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 04:51:05PM +0800, Alex Jia wrote:
> On 10/27/2011 04:15 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 03:17:59PM +0800, ajia(a)redhat.com wrote:
>>> From: Alex Jia<ajia(a)redhat.com>
>>>
>>> Cppcheck detected a syntaxError on lxcDomainInterfaceStats.
>>>
>>> * src/lxc/lxc_driver.c: fixed missing '{' in the function
lxcDomainInterfaceStats.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Jia<ajia(a)redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> src/lxc/lxc_driver.c | 1 +
>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc_driver.c b/src/lxc/lxc_driver.c
>>> index f08e8d1..06bfa85 100644
>>> --- a/src/lxc/lxc_driver.c
>>> +++ b/src/lxc/lxc_driver.c
>>> @@ -2671,6 +2671,7 @@ static int
>>> lxcDomainInterfaceStats(virDomainPtr dom,
>>> const char *path ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
>>> struct _virDomainInterfaceStats *stats
ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
>>> +{
>>> lxcError(VIR_ERR_NO_SUPPORT, "%s", __FUNCTION__);
>>> return -1;
>>> }
>> Hmm, I dunno why we even have a '#ifdef __linux__' in that file
>> since the entire file is Linux specific. We should just kill this
>> #else clause entirely
> You mean we should remove the following lines rather then reserving
> the function as
> a optional branch:
> #else
> static int
> lxcDomainInterfaceStats(virDomainPtr dom,
> const char *path ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
> struct _virDomainInterfaceStats *stats
> ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
> lxcError(VIR_ERR_NO_SUPPORT, "%s", __FUNCTION__);
> return -1;
> }
>
> If so, need I commit a v2 patch for this?
Yes, just remove that dummy function entirely.
Regards,
Daniel
Okay, I will commit a new patch for this instead of v2,
because the patch summary isn't appropriate.
Thanks,
Alex