On 6/4/21 2:50 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:36:11AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> This test was generated on a guest with the following NUMA
> configuration:
>
> <numa>
> <cell id='0' cpus='0-23' memory='4194304'
unit='KiB' discard='yes'>
> <cache level='1' associativity='direct'
policy='writeback'>
> <size value='10' unit='KiB'/>
> <line value='8' unit='B'/>
> </cache>
> <cache level='2' associativity='full'
policy='writethrough'>
> <size value='128' unit='KiB'/>
> <line value='16' unit='B'/>
> </cache>
> </cell>
> <cell id='1' memory='2097152' unit='KiB'>
> <cache level='1' associativity='direct'
policy='writeback'>
> <size value='10' unit='KiB'/>
> <line value='8' unit='B'/>
> </cache>
> </cell>
> <interconnects>
> <latency initiator='0' target='0' type='access'
value='5'/>
> <latency initiator='0' target='0' type='read'
value='6'/>
> <latency initiator='0' target='0' type='write'
value='7'/>
> <latency initiator='0' target='1' type='access'
value='10'/>
> <latency initiator='0' target='1' type='read'
value='11'/>
> <latency initiator='0' target='1' type='write'
value='12'/>
> <bandwidth initiator='0' target='0' type='access'
> value='204800' unit='KiB'/>
> <bandwidth initiator='0' target='0' type='read'
value='205824'
> unit='KiB'/>
> <bandwidth initiator='0' target='0' type='write'
value='206848'
> unit='KiB'/>
> <bandwidth initiator='0' target='0' cache='1'
type='access'
> value='208896' unit='KiB'/>
> <bandwidth initiator='0' target='0' cache='1'
type='read'
> value='209920' unit='KiB'/>
> <bandwidth initiator='0' target='0' cache='1'
type='write'
> value='210944' unit='KiB'/>
> <bandwidth initiator='0' target='1' type='access'
> value='102400' unit='KiB'/>
> <bandwidth initiator='0' target='1' type='read'
value='103424'
> unit='KiB'/>
> <bandwidth initiator='0' target='1' type='write'
value='104448'
> unit='KiB'/>
> <bandwidth initiator='0' target='1' cache='1'
type='access'
> value='105472' unit='KiB'/>
> <bandwidth initiator='0' target='1' cache='1'
type='read'
> value='106496' unit='KiB'/>
> <bandwidth initiator='0' target='1' cache='1'
type='write'
> value='107520' unit='KiB'/>
> </interconnects>
> </numa>
>
> The sysfs content was also copied over from the VM but only those
> files which are accessed in the test are stored in the repo.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com>
> ---
This unfortunately introduces symbolic link loops. They are fine in
sysfs, but we always had issues with them when running distcheck and
similar.
I tried it now and did not reproduce the exact issue, but it still is
not nice (global -u complains, some programs might just end up in an
infinite loop). Historically we replicated "just enough" to use it in
tests, but not so much that it would introduce loops. I would prefer if
it stayed that way.
Yeah, I remember us fixing this, but I don't recall all the details.
I'll switch to files.
Michal