On 3/23/22 4:17 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 12:01:19PM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 12:47 AM Jonathon Jongsma <jjongsma(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> This patch series enables support for the qemu-vdagent character device which
>> enables copy/paste support between guest and client when using vnc graphics.
>>
>> The guest must be configured with something like the following:
>>
>> <channel type='qemu-vdagent'>
>> <source clipboard='on' mouse='on'/>
>> <target type='virtio' name='com.redhat.spice.0'/>
>> </channel>
>>
>> Copy/paste sync requires a vnc client that has support for copy/paste commands.
>> Currently virt-viewer does not work, but the version of tigervnc provided by
>> fedora (executable name 'vncviewer') does work.
>>
>> More details about this device on Gerd's blog:
>>
https://www.kraxel.org/blog/2021/05/qemu-cut-paste/
>>
>> OPEN QUESTIONS:
>>
>> - I'm not fully convinced that the `<source>` element is the right
place for
>> the new `clipboard` / `mouse` configuration options, but I'm not sure
that
>> adding a new xml element to the `<channel>` is the right approach
either.
>> Suggestions welcome.
>
> I am not convinced <channel> is appropriate either for -chardev
> qemu-vdagent. That's why in my dbus display series it's an
> implementation detail
>
(
https://patchew.org/Libvirt/20211222194345.766352-1-marcandre.lureau@redh...),
> and it's not exposed to the domain XML directly. However I realize
> that my approach is probably broken, as it looks like I totally missed
> the associated virtserialport! :)
>
> As you say "source" is strange to put those extra channel options too.
>
> And the only really valid associated device is a virtserialport of
> name "com.redhat.spice.0", so what's the point in exposing that detail
> to the user?
You could say the same thing about the normal spice vdagent, right? And
we allow the user to specify a different virtio name for the spicevmc
channel. spice-vdagent does offer a --virtio-serial-port-path option
that can be used to connect to a different name within the guest, after all.
At the QEMU level we have one serial port with chardv
-chardev qemu-vdagent,id=ch1,name=vdagent,clipboard=on
-device virtio-serial-pci \
-device virtserialport,chardev=ch1,id=ch1,name=com.redhat.spice.0
but IIUC, we can have multiple frontends - ie both VNC and DBus
display, and in that case the clipboard=on property on the
chardev will apply to both VNC & DBus displays. We can't
control clipboard independantly for the displays, so it is
right to put the control in the XML for the <channel> for
both VNC and DBus.
In addition to <channel>, there are several other xml elements that
essentially map to a qemu character device: <serial>, <console>, etc.
Would it make more sense to introduce a new element like this for the
qemu-vdagent? This might make it easier to introduce new configuration
options that wouldn't really fit in the general <channel>. For example,
something like:
<qemuvdagent>
<clipboard copypaste="yes"/>
<target type='virtio' name='com.redhat.spice.0'/>
</qemuvdagent>
Jonathon