This patch changes virFileLoopDeviceOpen() to use the new loop-control
device to allocate a new loop device. If this behavior is unsupported
or an error occurs while trying to do this it falls back to the previous
method of searching /dev for a free device.
With this patch you can start as many image based LXC domains as you
like (well almost).
Fixes bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995543
Signed-off-by: Ian Main <imain(a)redhat.com>
---
configure.ac | 12 +++++++++++
src/util/virfile.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index ac8cfa1..10cd872 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -913,6 +913,18 @@ if test "$with_lxc" = "yes" || test
"$with_lxc" = "check"; then
AC_MSG_ERROR([Required kernel features for LXC were not found])
fi
])
+ AC_LINK_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM(
+ [[
+ #include <sched.h>
+ #include <linux/loop.h>
+ #include <sys/epoll.h>
+ ]], [[
+ unshare(!(LOOP_CTL_GET_FREE));
+ ]])], [
+ AC_DEFINE([HAVE_DECL_LOOP_CTL_GET_FREE], [1],
+ [Define to 1 if you have the declaration of `LOOP_CTL_GET_FREE',
+ and to 0 if you don't.])
+ ])
fi
if test "$with_lxc" = "yes" ; then
AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED([WITH_LXC], 1, [whether LXC driver is enabled])
diff --git a/src/util/virfile.c b/src/util/virfile.c
index 2b07ac9..f70f9fe 100644
--- a/src/util/virfile.c
+++ b/src/util/virfile.c
@@ -528,7 +528,47 @@ int virFileUpdatePerm(const char *path,
#if defined(__linux__) && HAVE_DECL_LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR
-static int virFileLoopDeviceOpen(char **dev_name)
+
+#if HAVE_DECL_LOOP_CTL_GET_FREE
+static int virFileLoopDeviceOpenLoopCtl(char **dev_name)
+{
+ int fd = -1;
+ int devnr;
+ char *looppath = NULL;
+
+ VIR_DEBUG("Opening loop-control device");
+ if ((fd = open("/dev/loop-control", O_RDWR)) < 0) {
+ virReportSystemError(errno, "%s",
+ _("Unable to open /dev/loop-control"));
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ if ((devnr = ioctl(fd, LOOP_CTL_GET_FREE)) < 0) {
+ virReportSystemError(errno, "%s",
+ _("Unable to get free loop device via ioctl"));
+ close(fd);
+ return -1;
+ }
+ close(fd);
+
+ VIR_DEBUG("Found free loop device number %i", devnr);
+
+ if (virAsprintf(&looppath, "/dev/loop%i", devnr) < 0)
+ return -1;
+
+ if ((fd = open(looppath, O_RDWR)) < 0) {
+ virReportSystemError(errno,
+ _("Unable to open %s"), looppath);
+ VIR_FREE(looppath);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ *dev_name = looppath;
+ return fd;
+}
+#endif /* HAVE_DECL_LOOP_CTL_GET_FREE */
+
+static int virFileLoopDeviceOpenSearch(char **dev_name)
{
int fd = -1;
DIR *dh = NULL;
@@ -601,6 +641,25 @@ cleanup:
return fd;
}
+static int virFileLoopDeviceOpen(char **dev_name)
+{
+ int loop_fd;
+
+#ifdef HAVE_DECL_LOOP_CTL_GET_FREE
+ loop_fd = virFileLoopDeviceOpenLoopCtl(dev_name);
+ VIR_DEBUG("Return from loop-control got fd %d\n", loop_fd);
+ if (loop_fd < 0) {
+ VIR_WARN("loop-control allocation failed, trying search technique.");
+ } else {
+ return loop_fd;
+ }
+#endif /* HAVE_DECL_LOOP_CTL_GET_FREE */
+
+ /* Without the loop control device we just use the old technique. */
+ loop_fd = virFileLoopDeviceOpenSearch(dev_name);
+
+ return loop_fd;
+}
int virFileLoopDeviceAssociate(const char *file,
char **dev)
--
1.8.1.4