On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 02:51:26PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
We historically format runtime seclabel selinux/apparmor values,
however we skip formatting runtime DAC values. This was added in
commit 990e46c4542349f838e001d30638872576c389e9
Author: Marcelo Cerri <mhcerri(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri Aug 31 13:40:41 2012 +0200
conf: Avoid formatting auto-generated DAC labels
to maintain migration compatibility with libvirt < 0.10.0.
However the formatting was skipped unconditionally. Instead only
skip formatting in the VIR_DOMAIN_DEF_FORMAT_MIGRATABLE case.
This all makes sense, but when I started tying it I've found it may
still cause some problems. Probably. The problem is that I have no
idea whether it's safer to use number or a name as the uid/gid. But
since we have that parsing code in place and this patch is not about
that, so we can deal with that later.
ACK