[...]
> Even though I came with another proposal, I personally still
like the previous
> version with one-by-one event version, since despite (perhaps) being a bit
> slower, it's a more transparent and consistent (minus the event counter)
> solution than the one I proposed the last time.
>
> Erik
>
I don't have that version paged into short term memory ;-)... If you
have a thread that processes events until udev_monitor_receive_device
returns NULL, then does that do the trick? Regardless of event counting?
Well, so far it's just an idea, I haven't tried it yet, it's just it appeared
to me like it could. I'll try and get back with results.
Erik