Re: [libvirt] consistency: push "update" hook vs. "make syntax-check"
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 03:14:30PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> So using 'tail' instead of this perl script would be
more readable
> and efficient.
tail -c2 might be my choice, too, for a small number of files.
But in our case, using it would incur the cost of 1000+ fork+execs.
I was thinking you'd just give it lots of files at once via xargs,
though then you have the tedium of parsing its output
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|