Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2 04/14] nodedev: Use switch for virNodeDeviceObjHasCap and virNodeDeviceCapMatch

In order to ensure that whenever something is added to virNodeDevCapType that both functions are considered for processing of a new capability, change the if-then-else construct into a switch statement. Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan(a)redhat.com&gt; --- src/conf/virnodedeviceobj.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/conf/virnodedeviceobj.c b/src/conf/virnodedeviceobj.c index bbb6eeb..913cdda 100644 --- a/src/conf/virnodedeviceobj.c +++ b/src/conf/virnodedeviceobj.c @@ -48,19 +48,41 @@ virNodeDeviceObjHasCap(const virNodeDeviceObj *dev, while (caps) { if (STREQ(cap, virNodeDevCapTypeToString(caps->data.type))) { return 1; - } else if (caps->data.type == VIR_NODE_DEV_CAP_SCSI_HOST) { - if ((STREQ(cap, fc_host_cap) && - (caps->data.scsi_host.flags & - VIR_NODE_DEV_CAP_FLAG_HBA_FC_HOST)) || - (STREQ(cap, vports_cap) && - (caps->data.scsi_host.flags & - VIR_NODE_DEV_CAP_FLAG_HBA_VPORT_OPS))) - return 1; - } else if (caps->data.type == VIR_NODE_DEV_CAP_PCI_DEV) { - if ((STREQ(cap, mdev_types)) && - (caps->data.pci_dev.flags & - VIR_NODE_DEV_CAP_FLAG_PCI_MDEV)) - return 1; + } else { + switch (caps->data.type) { + case VIR_NODE_DEV_CAP_PCI_DEV: + if ((STREQ(cap, mdev_types)) && + (caps->data.pci_dev.flags & + VIR_NODE_DEV_CAP_FLAG_PCI_MDEV))