Reviewed-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy(a)linux.ibm.com>
On 4/19/24 16:49, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
The documentation of gobject signals reads:
"If you are connecting handlers to signals and using a GObject instance as your
signal handler user data, you should remember to pair calls to
g_signal_connect() with calls to g_signal_handler_disconnect() or
g_signal_handlers_disconnect_by_func(). While signal handlers are automatically
disconnected when the object emitting the signal is finalised..." [1]
This means that the signal handlers are automatically disconnected as soon as
the `priv->mdevCtlMonitors` are finalised/released by `udevEventDataDispose`.
But this also means that it's possible that new work is tried to be scheduled
for the workerpool by the `mdevctlEventHandleCallback` (main thread context)
even if the workerpool has already been stopped by `nodeStateShutdownWait`. To
fully understand this, it's important to know that the main loop of the main
thread is still running for some time even after `nodeStateShutdownPrepare` has
been called. Let's avoid this situation by explicitly disconnect the signals
during `nodeStateShutdownPrepare`, which is called in the main thread, so that
no new work is attempted to be scheduled for the worker pool.
[
1]https://docs.gtk.org/gobject/signals.html#memory-management-of-signal-h...
Signed-off-by: Marc Hartmayer<mhartmay(a)linux.ibm.com>
---
src/node_device/node_device_udev.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind regards
Boris Fiuczynski
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Wolfgang Wendt
Geschäftsführung: David Faller
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294