On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 01:19:25PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:20:01AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 09:47:45AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>>On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 04:46:27PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>>On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 05:36:58PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
>>>>On 09/08/2014 01:40 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan(a)redhat.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> docs/formatdomain.html.in | 7 +++-
>>>>> docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng | 5 +++
>>>>> src/conf/cpu_conf.c | 25
+++++++++++-
>>>>> src/conf/cpu_conf.h | 7 ++--
>>>>> .../qemuxml2argv-cpu-numa-memshared.xml | 28
++++++++++++++
>>>>> .../qemuxml2argv-hugepages-shared.xml | 45
++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> tests/qemuxml2xmltest.c | 2 +
>>>>> 7 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>> create mode 100644
tests/qemuxml2argvdata/qemuxml2argv-cpu-numa-memshared.xml
>>>>> create mode 100644
tests/qemuxml2argvdata/qemuxml2argv-hugepages-shared.xml
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/docs/formatdomain.html.in b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
>>>>> index 94236dd..b284d6e 100644
>>>>> --- a/docs/formatdomain.html.in
>>>>> +++ b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
>>>>> @@ -1105,7 +1105,7 @@
>>>>> ...
>>>>> <numa>
>>>>> <cell id='0' cpus='0-3'
memory='512000'/>
>>>>> - <cell id='1' cpus='4-7'
memory='512000'/>
>>>>> + <cell id='1' cpus='4-7'
memory='512000' memShared='on'/>
>>>>
>>>>I wonder if "shared='on'" would be enough, avoiding the
need for a multi-word
>>>>attribute.
>>>
>>>Or how about access="shared|private" ?
>>>
>>
>>I prepended the "mem" so that it is visible that it has something to
>>do with the memory, not the whole node. But I'm OK with pushing
>>shared= as well. Using access= seems too ambiguously worded to me,
>>although if most of you agree...
>
>Sure, memAccess is fine with me.
>
Is there any possibility of that option having another value (in the
future)? Otherwise shared= seems more appropriate to me. Let's see
what others think, so I can finally get rid of this problem :)
I prefer the approach of having values reflect the usage, as 'shared' vs
'private' for the value is clearer than 'on' vs 'off' IMHO.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|