Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] Put virt-sanlock-cleanup into section 8

On 07/03/2013 07:11 AM, Guido Günther wrote: >> >> Looks like daemon/Makefile.am needs the same tweak for libvirtd.8. > > Since libvirtd.8.in in processed by sed and not pod2man it doesn't need > any additional tweaks. Or am I missing something? Huh, you're right. I just checked 'man virt-sanlock-cleanup' and 'man libvirtd' on my system, and libvirtd already claimed section 8. I'm not sure what the difference is that libvirtd already did it right. > > It's only the reference inside virt-sanlock-cleanup's manpage that's > wrong. It states it's virt-sanlock-cleanup(1) while it's > virt-sanlock-cleanup(8). > > So o.k. to push with only the s/indicates/indicated/ fixed? Yes.