Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 5/5] xenFoxenFormatXLDisk: Don't leak @target
On 02/06/2017 08:18 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote:
Michal Privoznik wrote:
> ==11260== 1,006 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 106 of 111
> ==11260== at 0x4C2AE5F: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:297)
> ==11260== by 0x4C2BDFF: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:693)
> ==11260== by 0x4EA430B: virReallocN (viralloc.c:245)
> ==11260== by 0x4EA7C52: virBufferGrow (virbuffer.c:130)
> ==11260== by 0x4EA7D28: virBufferAdd (virbuffer.c:165)
> ==11260== by 0x4EA8E10: virBufferStrcat (virbuffer.c:718)
> ==11260== by 0x42D263: xenFormatXLDiskSrcNet (xen_xl.c:960)
> ==11260== by 0x42D4EB: xenFormatXLDiskSrc (xen_xl.c:1015)
> ==11260== by 0x42D870: xenFormatXLDisk (xen_xl.c:1101)
> ==11260== by 0x42DA89: xenFormatXLDomainDisks (xen_xl.c:1148)
> ==11260== by 0x42EAF8: xenFormatXL (xen_xl.c:1558)
> ==11260== by 0x40E85F: testCompareParseXML (xlconfigtest.c:105)
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com>
Strange function name in $subject. s/xenFoxenFormatXLDisk/xenFormatXLDisk/
Ah, indeed. I've started writing the function name and then copy-pasted
it. I am a giddy goat :-)
ACK.
Thanks, I've pushed this one.
Michal