On 08/07/2017 10:16 PM, Chen Hanxiao wrote:
At 2017-08-03 08:40:48, "John Ferlan"
<jferlan(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 07/28/2017 04:33 AM, Chen Hanxiao wrote:
>> From: Chen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao(a)gmail.com>
>>
>> Many vendor id's and product id's have leading zeros.
>> Show them in error messages.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao(a)gmail.com>
>> ---
>> src/util/virhostdev.c | 8 ++++----
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>
> Looking at some other examples...
>
> if (usbsrc->vendor) {
> virBufferAsprintf(buf, "<vendor id='0x%.4x'/>\n",
usbsrc->vendor);
> virBufferAsprintf(buf, "<product id='0x%.4x'/>\n",
usbsrc->product);
>
> and
>
> if (usbdev->vendor >= 0)
> virBufferAsprintf(buf, " vendor='0x%04X'",
usbdev->vendor);
>
> if (usbdev->product >= 0)
> virBufferAsprintf(buf, " product='0x%04X'",
usbdev->product);
>
> Perhaps the best thing to do is be consistent with all of them... Could
> take a bit of searching, but cscope's egrep is pretty good w/
> "vendor.*%.*x" (and X).
>
> There's also a usage in libxl_conf, where "%x:%x" is used. So it may
be
> best to find all possible print's of vendor and make them all consistent.
>
The %x:%x should be fixed.
x or X just show a different style.
Others like .4x, 04x have the same effect.
Maybe we should leave them untouched.
I think if you're modifying one then we should make them all consistent.
It leaves less questions that way. IIRC the last time this came up I
think using %.4x was preferred (or X if you care about capital letters).
John
Regards,
- Chen