On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 03:53:29PM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08:10:21PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
> Yes, the documentation is wrong - all inactive VMs have an ID
> of -1, and thus lookup-by-ID is nonsensical for inactive VMs.
>
> If any application did make use of this change which falls back to
> lookup-by-name, then it would only ever work with OpenVZ and not
> any of the other libvirt drivers, which isn't useful behaviour.
[...]
> > Then the virLookupById description must be updated, I'm not against it,
> > but we need to be coherent.
>
> Indeed, the docs need to be clarified.
okay, what about
* Try to find a domain based on the hypervisor ID number
* Note that this won't work for inactive domains which have an ID of -1,
* in that case a lookup based on the Name or UUId need to be done instead.
and then revert that specific part of the patch, as attached. Also
I would make a 'make rebuild' in the doc directory and push the doc update
Yep, that gets my vote
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o-
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org -o-
http://ovirt.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|