On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 06:23:05PM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
Calling virDiskNameToIndex with a disk name > {sd,hd,xvd,vd}z,
such as
vdaa, generates a bogus index. Account for iterations through the loop.
Old behaviour:
vda -> 0
vdz -> 25
vdaa -> 0
vdaz -> 25
New behaviour:
vda -> 0
vdz -> 25
vdaa -> 26
vdaz -> 51
This was discovered by Sanjay Rao, thanks for the report.
ACK.
Good to know someone's testing scalability with > 26 disks :-)
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o-
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org -o-
http://ovirt.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|