On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 14:42:07 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 03:35:27PM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 16:35:05 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >
> > I was wondering if we should actually expose this in the
> > XML, as a read-only attribute, only shown when requesting
> > the live XML. Otherwise there's no way for an application
> > to determine whether the USB device they requested was
> > actually given to the guest, without looking inside the
> > guest.
>
> Yeah, this sounds like a useful thing. Could that be a follow up patch to
> avoid holding up the whole series just for this? :-)
As long as we do the followup now, I'm fine with it being separate.
Just don't want us to release anything without it.
Sure, I'm already working on it. I just wanted to push this since Peter is
afraid of it conflicting with his work.
Jirka