Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] docs: Update style for <dt> elements
On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 08:04 -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
Add bolding for <dt> elements to make them "stick
out" on the page rather
that just a stream of text where the <dt> elements only differ by slightly
different font style since most uses encase the text within using <code>
Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan(a)redhat.com>
---
I had suggested this during a review of Andrea's changes late last month:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-March/msg01501.html
but figure I'll make the more 'formal' patch request...
Yeah, sorry about that. I just forgot :(
docs/generic.css | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/docs/generic.css b/docs/generic.css
index 208e31e..b86bb88 100644
--- a/docs/generic.css
+++ b/docs/generic.css
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ ul, ol {
dt {
margin-left: 1em;
margin-right: 2em;
+ font-weight: bold;
}
dl dd {
This styling is appropriate when the content of <dt> is a
<code> element, because that makes the font smaller.
This is the case for most of the <dt>s in our documentation,
but not *all* of them. I've just posted a patch[1] that fixes
a bunch of <dt>s that were missing the inner <code> element,
but that still leaves out a few that are just not supposed to
have it - look no further than contact.html for an example.
So my proposal is, apply my patch first, and then add
dt code {
font-weight: bold;
}
to the stylesheet instead.
Sounds good?
[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-April/msg01476.html
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization Team