On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:51:43AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 09:25:55PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> The docs are wrong. Destory merely hard-kills the object being managed.
> It does not free memory associated with the object.
No, the documentation says it frees the objects (and has done
forever), so it should free them. I have code which depends on this
behaviour.
It depends on behaviour which does *not* exist so is already broken. With
inactive domains free'ing the object after destroy is non-sensical because
the domain still exists, merely in the shutoff state.
Dan.
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, Boston -o-
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org -o-
http://ovirt.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|