On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 03:31:19PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 10:26:04AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> The complexity comes if you think you need to return an array of integer.
> I guess if you just consider passing an unsigned long in and back, filled
It should be a fixed-size type, surely, and even then I doubt 64 bits is
enough in the mid to long term.
Since it's not public and just an RPC layer, if you need to check for
more you can add a new separate call. I would not worry for this.
Daniel
--
Red Hat Virtualization group
http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard | virtualization library
http://libvirt.org/
veillard(a)redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit
http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine
http://rpmfind.net/