On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 03:54:07PM +0200, Michal Novotny wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 02:57:10PM +0200, Michal Novotny wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> this is the patch to introduce the TXT record support for the DNS
>>> service on the virtual network. This can be defined using the
>>> txt-record subelement in the dns element of the network XML
>>> description.
>>>
>>> First patch is adding TXT record support to the DNS service on
>>> the virtual network and the second patch is adding support for
>>> defining hosts for the DNS service.
>>>
>>> The new definition syntax is:
>>>
>>> <dns>
>>> <txt-record name="example name" value="example
value" />
>>> <host ip='192.168.122.1'>
>>> <hostname>gateway</hostname>
>>> <hostname>host</hostname>
>>> </host>
>>> </dns>
>>>
>>> Where multiple host elements can be defined to put the aliases
>>> for specified IP addresses.
>>>
>>> The patch series has been tested for the configuration and it
>>> was working fine and also RelaxNG schema with the tests have
>>> been both altered to add test cases to test those patches.
>>>
>>> Both of the patches passed make, syntax checking and all the
>>> tests.
>> Principle sounds fine but let's defer this to after 0.9.0, :)
>>
>> Daniel
>>
> Oh, do you mean we not only put this to version after 0.9.0 but also we
> add some new things to this as well?
>
> Is my patch good for this and will we just merge it to "after 0.9.0"
> version or should we rewrite it entirely once it's OK? Since I don't
> work in libvirt team maybe I won't be working on this one (unless
> somebody ask me to do it) so based on this fact I'm not primarily
> working in the libvirt team I may not know about whether work on this
> one is on or not so maybe it's good if you ask me to work on this when
> it's on or lead the assigned engineer to ask me about this.
Just that we are in freeze for 0.9.0, so I suggest to review and
apply this there after, say early next week,
Daniel
Well, that way I think it's OK and committee could simply change 0.9.0
in the formatnetwork.html.in to 0.9.1 if there are no further issues
with the patch itself and once it's ACKed :)
Michal
--
Michal Novotny <minovotn(a)redhat.com>, RHCE
Virtualization Team (xen userspace), Red Hat