On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 03:10:13PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote:
Jim Fehlig wrote:
> Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 01:58:02PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:43:15AM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> It will not be possible to detach such device later. Also
improve
>>>>>> logging in such cases.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
<marmarek(a)invisiblethingslab.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> src/libxl/libxl_driver.c | 41
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/src/libxl/libxl_driver.c
b/src/libxl/libxl_driver.c
>>>>>> index ce3a99b..005cc96 100644
>>>>>> --- a/src/libxl/libxl_driver.c
>>>>>> +++ b/src/libxl/libxl_driver.c
>>>>>> @@ -2787,6 +2787,7 @@
libxlDomainAttachNetDevice(libxlDriverPrivatePtr driver,
>>>>>> int actualType;
>>>>>> libxl_device_nic nic;
>>>>>> int ret = -1;
>>>>>> + char mac[VIR_MAC_STRING_BUFLEN];
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /* preallocate new slot for device */
>>>>>> if (VIR_REALLOC_N(vm->def->nets, vm->def->nnets
+ 1) < 0)
>>>>>> @@ -2801,6 +2802,14 @@
libxlDomainAttachNetDevice(libxlDriverPrivatePtr driver,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> actualType = virDomainNetGetActualType(net);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + /* -2 means "multiple matches" so then fail also
*/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> No longer true after commit 2fbae1b2. I think you just want to
check if
>>>>> virDomainNetFindIdx() >= 0, meaning the def already contains a
net
>>>>> device with the same mac address.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> But here the error is when the device *is* found, so the opposite case
>>>> than already reported as an error by virDomainNetFindIdx.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> If you find an idx >= 0, then the domain def already contains a net
>>> device with the same mac address, right? In that case, you report an
>>> error and return failure from libxlDomainAttachNetDevice().
>>>
>>>
>> Right, but if I do not find one (idx == -1), I will proceed with
>> (possibly successful) adding the device, while the error was already
>> reported by virDomainNetFindIdx.
>>
>>
>
> Ah, right :-/.
>
> Another option: introduce virDomainHasNet() to detect if the domain def
> already contains the net device.
>
A better option would be to fix this in libxl, for the benefit of other
libxl apps.
Actually libxl has no problem with duplicated mac addresses, its libvirt
that makes problem. Such device cannot be removed, because net devices
are identified by mac address, so can be unambitiously specified in case
of duplicates.
--
Best Regards,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Invisible Things Lab
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?