On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 03:39:53PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Thu, 2019-03-28 at 11:29 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 12:23:24PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > As mentioned above, we rely on backports for the JRE, so while
> > we could simply disable the jessie-backport repository that would
> > leave us with some packages that are installed on the system but
> > can't be updated, a situation that I would not be particularly
> > comfortable with.
>
> Ah, so the problem isn't that Jessie has been moved to
archive.debian.org,
> it is that the jessie-backports repo has been moved / EOLd.
>
> I'm fine with dropping Jessie given that we'll be dropping it in a couple
> of months anyway.
Alright, I'll cook some patches then :)
> We should spin up Buster to replace it too
We've ever introduced support for unreleased operating systems in our
CI environment[1], and I'm not sure it would be a good idea to start
now... It seems to me like it would be pretty misleading.
I think the fact that we've not done it in the past is a bug really,
not really a good thing. Unless we have capacity problems, I don't
see a good reason to avoid it, given that we already run the more
flakey rawhide/sid distros.
Personally I'd just live with running tests on single Debian
release
until Buster is actually out.
[1] Fedora Rawhide, Debian sid and FreeBSD -CURRENT don't count since
they're unreleased by definition :)
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
https://berrange.com -o-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|:
https://libvirt.org -o-
https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|:
https://entangle-photo.org -o-
https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|