Pino Toscano <ptoscano(a)redhat.com> [2018-08-02, 10:02AM +0200]:
I do not think this patch is correct: we are dealing with random
bytes,
so there is no "endianness" for them.
Well, it's not incorrect either, isn't it? I agree that endianness
doesn't matter for random data, but in the same time, it doesn't hurt to
have the same random data generated on big- and little-endian machines.
And it gives an easy and future-proof fix for the mocked tests.