On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 01:16:01PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
On 01/19/2012 12:01 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> +
>> +VIR_ENUM_DECL(virTypedParameter)
>> +VIR_ENUM_IMPL(virTypedParameter, VIR_TYPED_PARAM_STRING + 1,
>
> I'm slowly coming to the view that we should juust add "_LAST" to
> every single one of our public enums.
>
> But perhaps have them disabled by default, unless the app developer
> does
>
> #define LIBVIRT_ENUM_SENTINALS
>
> before including libvirt.h, so they make a concious decision to use a
> enum value known to change.
Sounds like an interesting idea, but I'll save it for a followup.
Sure, no problem.
Would it be acceptable to protect existing _LAST values when adding
all
the new ones, or must we keep those unconditionally defined to avoid
breaking compilation of anyone that was using them?
I think we could get away with protecting existing ones too, since
apps can easily just add the #define, even when building with older
libvirt and it'll be harmless
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|