Re: [libvirt] libvirt vs XenAPI

Hi, Alain I guess Daniel says xend issue.(since it relates to XenAPI) As for hypervisor, You are correct in RHEL5.2 and CentOS5.2. Current RHEL/Xen is very complex compared to upstream Xen. Thanks Atsushi SAKAI "Alain Barthe" <ab266061(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > 2008/9/4 Daniel Veillard <veillard(a)redhat.com&gt; > > > On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 06:09:43PM +0200, atif bajwa wrote: > > > Just quick question, > > > what version of Xen/XenApi is packaged in RHEL 5.1/5.2. Can I remotely > > > access it using XML-RPC API or not? > > > > RHEL-5.2 has xen-3.0.3, and that will stay the same for the lifetime > > of RHEL5. There is no XenAPI for this, as Dan Berrange told you > > already. And for remote access you have libvirt support. > > > On CentOS-5.2 (same as RedHat, IFAIK), xen is 3.1.2. Don't believe rpm > version, check "xm info" instead. > > > > > > > > Daniel > > > > -- > > Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ > > daniel(a)veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ > > http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ > > > > -- > > Libvir-list mailing list > > Libvir-list(a)redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list > > -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list