John Levon wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 09:23:19AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 01:45:36PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> It would still be useful to have a chart describing what APIs are
>>> implemented
>>> by which driver though & any restrictions the impl may have.
>> I'll have a go at this.
> Yes that would be useful thanks ! But I'm afraid it may be painful to
> maintain too, as the various case may increase and the state of the
> drivers/hypervisors will evolve.
This is why library documentation should *always* mention what version
an API became supported/was added in. It's utterly miserable trying to
use an evolving library otherwise :)
Point taken - I will try to add version numbers reflecting when
operations became supported.
Rich.
--
Emerging Technologies, Red Hat -
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/
Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod
Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in
England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903