On 10/29/2010 11:33 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 10/26/2010 05:27 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 10/26/2010 07:08 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Sorry for sounding so depressing; I'm very pleased to see your efforts
>> in providing tests for the code you've written. Even though this test
>> is intended to be skipped on non-Linux, you still have to worry about
>> merely parsing through the test on other platforms like Solaris, where
>> /bin/sh won't understand the bash-isms and where /bin/bash is not
>> guaranteed to exist. But if we decide that requiring the presence of
>> /bin/bash is acceptable for the TCK, then a lot of my review becomes
>> irrelevant; but my comments about your mkstemp replacement being
>> insecure are still applicable even in that case.
>>
> Ok. Well, I hope for bash then...
IRC verdict - Dan and I are both okay with assuming /bin/bash exists.
So, that just leaves cleaning up the temporary file management. Would
you like me to tackle that as an incremental diff on top of your
original patch?
Yes, you can put it in on top of it. So is this an ACK now so I can push?
I just currently don't have the time to convert it into a generic shell
script, but put that on a future todo list. Also the original nwfilter
test should probably be converted then as well...
Stefan