Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
So by default, the algorithm dnsmasq uses for DNS lookups is
a) Different from that use by GLibC
b) Wrong
Thus I think we should always use --strict-order when running dnsmasq. The
attached patch adds this
The patch is fine, but I don't understand why you think the dnsmasq
algorithm is any less right than the glibc/resolver one.
Rich.
--
Emerging Technologies, Red Hat
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/
64 Baker Street, London, W1U 7DF Mobile: +44 7866 314 421
Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod
Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, United Kingdom.
Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA) and David
Owens (Ireland)