[libvirt PATCH 1/2] docs: Fix names for PF and VF PCI device capabilities
The proper name for physical function capability is 'phys_function', not
'physical_function'. Likewise, a virtual function capability is
'virt_functions' rather than 'virtual_function'.
Signed-off-by: Jonathon Jongsma <jjongsma(a)redhat.com>
---
docs/formatnode.html.in | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/formatnode.html.in b/docs/formatnode.html.in
index c2a8f8fb7a..7dcd3638ff 100644
--- a/docs/formatnode.html.in
+++ b/docs/formatnode.html.in
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@
exists, it has a mandatory <code>type</code> attribute
which will be set to:
<dl>
- <dt><code>physical_function</code></dt>
+ <dt><code>phys_function</code></dt>
<dd>
That means there will be a single <code>address</code>
subelement which contains the PCI address of the SRIOV
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@
(and this device is, by implication, an SRIOV Virtual
Function (VF)).
</dd>
- <dt><code>virtual_function</code></dt>
+ <dt><code>virt_functions</code></dt>
<dd>
In this case this device is an SRIOV PF, and the capability
element will have a list of <code>address</code>
--
2.21.3