Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] tests: Test for nwfilter
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:02:01PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
...
> However, a test that's skipped whenever it detects a running
> libvirtd is less valuable than one that runs unconditionally,
> so libvirt-tck is probably the ideal destination.
>
> It is critically important to have an easily accessible "make check"-
> like process that can be used to exercise more of libvirt.
> I hope libvirt-tck will soon fit the bill.
It already fits that bill & is catching & preventing significant bugs in
QEMU. It has been invaluable in porting libvirt to the new QEMU JSON
interface for command & control - it wouldn't have been practical without
it in fact.
Didn't mean to impugn libvirt-tck. On the contrary, it looks great.
It's just that we need a way to be able to run -- quickly and conveniently --
"make check"-style tests, including integration tests.