On 02/20/2012 01:55 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 02/20/2012 10:10 AM, Laine Stump wrote:
> +
> +/* Flags for the 'type' field in next struct */
Should we specifically call out virDomainDeviceDef, rather than the
vague "next struct"? But this is faithful code motion, for now.
Even though this patch was (mostly - see my addition of
DEVICE_TYPE_NONE) code change, and I hadn't noticed that comment's exact
text before, I agree with you, so I'm changing it to specifically say
virDomainDeviceDef instead of "next struct".