On 20.05.20 14:20, Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
On 5/18/20 2:56 PM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> src/util/virhostcpu.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> .../linux-s390x-with-frequency.signature | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 tests/virhostcpudata/linux-s390x-with-frequency.signature
>
> diff --git a/src/util/virhostcpu.c b/src/util/virhostcpu.c
> index 0ce895cb39..0caf7959ef 100644
> --- a/src/util/virhostcpu.c
> +++ b/src/util/virhostcpu.c
> @@ -1430,8 +1430,9 @@ virHostCPUReadSignature(virArch arch,
> g_autofree char *model = NULL;
> g_autofree char *stepping = NULL;
> g_autofree char *revision = NULL;
> + g_autofree char *proc = NULL;
> - if (!ARCH_IS_X86(arch) && !ARCH_IS_PPC64(arch))
> + if (!ARCH_IS_X86(arch) && !ARCH_IS_PPC64(arch) &&
!ARCH_IS_S390(arch))
> return 0;
> while (fgets(line, lineLen, cpuinfo)) {
> @@ -1479,6 +1480,19 @@ virHostCPUReadSignature(virArch arch,
> *signature = g_strdup_printf("%s, rev %s", name,
revision);
> return 0;
> }
> + } else if (ARCH_IS_S390(arch)) {
> + if (STREQ(parts[0], "vendor_id")) {
> + if (!vendor)
> + vendor = g_steal_pointer(&parts[1]);
> + } else if (STREQ(parts[0], "processor 0")) {
> + if (!proc)
> + proc = g_steal_pointer(&parts[1]);
> + }
To catch scenarios of moving from LPAR to nested kvm or the other way around facilties
must be added here as well.
Yes. This would also cover the case when a firmware update adds features.