Re: [libvirt] [PATCH REPOST 01/38] virlog: Return void instead of int in virLogReset<Foo> methods

In this particular case, reset is meant as clearing the whole list of outputs/filters, not resetting it to a predefined default setting. Looking at it from that perspective, returning the number of records removed doesn't help the caller in any way (not that any of the callers would actually check for it). Well, callers could detect an error from the number of successfully removed records, but the only thing that can fail in virLogReset is force closing a file descriptor in which case the error isn't propagated back to virLogReset anyway. Conclusion: there is no practical use for having a return type of 'int' rather than 'void' in this case.