On 14.01.2013 15:34, Osier Yang wrote:
This enrichs HBA's xml by dumping the number of max vports and
vports in use. Format is like:
<capability type='vport_ops'>
<max_vports>164</max_vports>
<vports>5</vports>
</capability>
* docs/formatnode.html.in: (Document the new XML)
* docs/schemas/nodedev.rng: (Add the schema)
* src/conf/node_device_conf.h: (New member for data.scsi_host)
* src/node_device/node_device_linux_sysfs.c: (Collect the value of
max_vports and vports)
---
docs/formatnode.html.in | 10 ++++--
docs/schemas/nodedev.rng | 6 +++
src/conf/node_device_conf.c | 7 +++-
src/conf/node_device_conf.h | 2 +
src/node_device/node_device_linux_sysfs.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
5 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/node_device/node_device_linux_sysfs.c
b/src/node_device/node_device_linux_sysfs.c
index 054afea..b498726 100644
--- a/src/node_device/node_device_linux_sysfs.c
+++ b/src/node_device/node_device_linux_sysfs.c
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@
int
detect_scsi_host_caps_linux(union _virNodeDevCapData *d)
{
+ char *max_vports = NULL;
+ char *vports = NULL;
int ret = -1;
VIR_DEBUG("Checking if host%d is an FC HBA", d->scsi_host.host);
@@ -50,7 +52,7 @@ detect_scsi_host_caps_linux(union _virNodeDevCapData *d)
if (virReadFCHost(NULL,
d->scsi_host.host,
"port_name",
- &d->scsi_host.wwpn) == -1) {
+ &d->scsi_host.wwpn) < 0) {
VIR_ERROR(_("Failed to read WWPN for host%d"),
d->scsi_host.host);
goto cleanup;
}
@@ -58,7 +60,7 @@ detect_scsi_host_caps_linux(union _virNodeDevCapData *d)
if (virReadFCHost(NULL,
d->scsi_host.host,
"node_name",
- &d->scsi_host.wwnn) == -1) {
+ &d->scsi_host.wwnn) < 0) {
VIR_ERROR(_("Failed to read WWNN for host%d"),
d->scsi_host.host);
goto cleanup;
}
@@ -66,23 +68,61 @@ detect_scsi_host_caps_linux(union _virNodeDevCapData *d)
if (virReadFCHost(NULL,
d->scsi_host.host,
"fabric_name",
- &d->scsi_host.fabric_wwn) == -1) {
+ &d->scsi_host.fabric_wwn) < 0) {
VIR_ERROR(_("Failed to read fabric WWN for host%d"),
d->scsi_host.host);
goto cleanup;
}
}
- if (virIsCapableVport(NULL, d->scsi_host.host) == 0)
+ if (virIsCapableVport(NULL, d->scsi_host.host) == 0) {
d->scsi_host.flags |= VIR_NODE_DEV_CAP_FLAG_HBA_VPORT_OPS;
+ if (virReadFCHost(NULL,
+ d->scsi_host.max_vports,
+ "max_npiv_vports",
+ &max_vports) < 0) {
+ VIR_ERROR(_("Failed to read max_npiv_vports for host%d"),
+ d->scsi_host.host);
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
+
+ if (virReadFCHost(NULL,
+ d->scsi_host.max_vports,
+ "npiv_vports_inuse",
+ &vports) < 0) {
+ VIR_ERROR(_("Failed to read npiv_vports_inuse for host%d"),
+ d->scsi_host.host);
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
+
+ if (virStrToLong_i(max_vports, NULL, 10,
+ &d->scsi_host.max_vports) < 0) {
+ VIR_ERROR(_("Failed to parse value of max_npiv_vports
'%s'"),
+ max_vports);
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
+
+ if (virStrToLong_i(vports, NULL, 10,
+ &d->scsi_host.vports) < 0) {
+ VIR_ERROR(_("Failed to parse value of npiv_vports_inuse
'%s'"),
+ vports);
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
+ }
+
ret = 0;
cleanup:
if (ret == -1) {
And again. I'd rewrite this condition as well. But you don't have to.
+ /* Clear the flags in case of producing confusing XML output
*/
+ d->scsi_host.flags = 0;
I don't think so. Shouldn't we be just clearing those two flags and
don't touch the others?
+
VIR_FREE(d->scsi_host.wwnn);
VIR_FREE(d->scsi_host.wwpn);
VIR_FREE(d->scsi_host.fabric_wwn);
}
+ VIR_FREE(max_vports);
+ VIR_FREE(vports);
return ret;
}
Michal