On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 16:38:20 +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 13:04 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 01:58:50PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 12:49:21 +0000, Daniel Berrange wrote:
> > >
> > > When redoing the website we deleted the libvirtLogo.png file
> > > not remembering that the test driver screenshot API impl
> > > relied on it.
> > >
> > > Rather than having the test driver use the logo as a side
> > > effect, give it its own dedicated image to use. This is
> > > installed in /usr/share/libvirt/test-screenshot.png and
> >
> > Is it worth wasting 48k of disk space for a picture that almost nobody
> > ever will see on every installation of libvirt?
>
> 48k is completely lost in the noise when you consider the minimal install
> footprint of libvirt. libvirt-libs is 23 MB in size, not even counting
> the dependancies it pulls in.
How about a pngcrush'd 640x480 solid color? Not only it would
be way smaller, but we would also remove any possible confusion
about it being an actual screenshot of a running domain.
I would agree with such solution.