Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 01:25:05PM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 10:20:22AM -0700, Dave Leskovec wrote:
>> Daniel Veillard wrote:
>>> I would rather keep the type attribute value small, and if possible
>>> the same as the one used for the connection URIs, 'lxr' would be just
fine
>>> IMHO
>> I'll second Vivek's suggestion for 'lxc' for consistency.
> Of course !
>
>>> What do you think of the idea of commiting parts 1/2/3 once we are done
>>> with their second review ?
>> I think that'd be great.
> okay, let's try to do this over the next few days, I think I commented
> on the 3 modules, it can mostly go as is, I would just revamp the configuration
> parsing as indicated earlier.
Okay, I did just that, I applied th 3 first patches to CVS and commited
after changing the type to 'lxc' and growing the XML buffer size to 16K
Let's use patches based on CVS from now on :-)
I will look now at cleaning up the parsing code as explained in my review,
that I can do easilly,
Daniel
Excellent. Thanks!
--
Best Regards,
Dave Leskovec
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Virtualization